On Wednesday 19 April 2017 15:52:08 IST Ruairi Hickey wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 April 2017 16:34:05 IST Pau wrote:
> > list modes 'ap'
> > list modes 'apname'
> > list modes 'ieee80211s'
> > option channel_2ghz '11'
> > option channel_5ghz '48'
>
> Hi,
> That seems to have worked OK.... I have a 3rd box at home which I will
> test as well to try get all 3 on the mesh. The routers are 3 x TPLink TL-
> WR841N.
>
> iw dev wlan0-mesh station dump
> Station 84:16:f9:d9:18:6e (on wlan0-mesh)
> inactive time: 20 ms
> rx bytes: 492473
> rx packets: 7570
> tx bytes: 270
> tx packets: 3
> tx retries: 0
> tx failed: 0
> signal: -19 [-20, -26] dBm
> signal avg: -18 [-20, -22] dBm
> Toffset: -335602982 us
> tx bitrate: 6.5 MBit/s MCS 0
> rx bitrate: 19.5 MBit/s MCS 2
> mesh llid: 7348
> mesh plid: 5441
> mesh plink: ESTAB
> mesh local PS mode: ACTIVE
> mesh peer PS mode: ACTIVE
> mesh non-peer PS mode: ACTIVE
> authorized: yes
> authenticated: yes
> preamble: long
> WMM/WME: yes
> MFP: no
> TDLS peer: no
> connected time: 390 seconds
>
>
> Thanks,
> Ruairi
Hi,
While the mesh appears to be up and the stations can see each other there
is no ip connectivity - if a client is connected to the libremesh.org via AP
node d9:18:6e it can connect to the internet / outside via AP d9:44:80. Are
there additional steps required to enable this (it works out of the box on ad-
hoc) ? Apologies if I am asking stupid questions.... this is new to me but
if I can assist in any way please let me know...
Thanks,
Ruairi
We're going to write on the web a list of tested routers, just for
helping the visitors to have an idea of the supported/recommended
routers without copying and pasting the whole list provided by
OpenWrt/LEDE.
The discussion on this is here:
https://github.com/libremesh/lime-web/pull/14
Please answer with the routers you tried with LibreMesh.
I played with:
TP-Link WDR3600
TP-Link WR1043ND-v1
Ubiquiti NanoBridge M5
Ubiquiti NanoStation M5 XM
Ubiquiti NanoStation LoCo M2
Hi,
I am trying to experiment on setting up 802.11s instead of adhoc for the
mesh configuration but I am finding it very hard to find information on this ?
Does anyone have instructions / sample working config file for this ?
I understand I have to disable mode ad-hoc and replace with ieee802.11s - is
this correct ?
Thanks
Ruairi
I am pretty inexperienced in compiling
I have managed to compile the master branch but not 17.02
"git clone -b 17.02 git: //github.com/libremesh/lime-build"
and
"make T = mt7620 V = s"
led to the error
"rule for checkout failed (makefile line 168)"
where is the problem?
Tx
Jürgen Kimmel
>From the lime-dev mailing list :D
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [lime-dev] leipzig release hackathon
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 21:10:39 +0200
From: Daniel Golle <daniel(a)makrotopia.org>
Reply-To: libremesh development <lime-dev(a)lists.libremesh.org>
To: libremesh development <lime-dev(a)lists.libremesh.org>
hi!
p4u mentioned that there is interest in a hackathon for the next
libremesh release. at first i was sceptical whether this would be a
good idea (because i just came back to leipzig myself and things
weren't as comfortable as i was hoping). however i can now officially
invite you because everybody here likes the idea. you will have choice
between spaces with all sorts of possible test-deployments which will
be thankful. one new and pretty large trailerspace now got VDSL with
50MBit/s and they need to distribute the available bandwidth in a
quite large space and among quite a number of people. they also got
a building on the which can host all of us and provide useful working
space (electricity and, as i mentioned, bandwidth :)
anyway: if this is desired, i'll need to know the exact timeframe and
number of people to expect asap to go to the affected assemblies and
reserve the space for us. it'd also be nice to put a mixed agenda
which would also involve some talks and workshop with a general
audience (think: people who might have heard about freifunk but have no
idea about the details as well as folks interested in deployment skills
and maybe even developers, but that'd definitely be a minority).
and a decent release party :)
let me know what you think!
cheers
daniel
_______________________________________________
lime-dev mailing list
lime-dev(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-dev
Hi all
A quick question here. I’m the opposite of an expert on protocol technicalities like layer 2, layer 3, etc… but I get the general idea of LiMe having both layer 2 and 3 routing, and such.
I’m wondering though, since every node, at least in our network, has the 10.13.0.1 IP on the lan side, how are conflicts avoided or solved when a device with IP 10.13.0.108 - for example - roams to a WLAN of a node where a device with such IP is already present? Or are IP leases monitored network-wide to avoid two devices having the same IP at the same time anywhere on the network? And if so, how big a pool do you need to always accomodate such vast numbers of clients?
I hope this makes sense and is not based on completely wrong assumptions or understandings.
Thank you in advance
Nk
Hello,
I'm looking for a model which will be possible to buy in stores now.
Because many of models are already out of the stores.
Do you have any recommendation about what the most recent routers can I
use for libremesh approach?
I've already digged this table ...
http://libremesh.org/docs/hardware/index.html but may be you have more
ideas.
Many thanks,
Mikhail
LEDE Reboot r1278 / LuCI Master (git-16.280.54886-e06c60a)
Installation flawless
Nodes mesh
Internet access to gateway node ok to others no
Any idea?
Cheers
