-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 07/11/16 15:09, Amuza wrote:
On 07/11/16 12:52, Ilario wrote:
2016-11-07 12:02 GMT+01:00 Amuza
<amuza(a)riseup.net>et>:
On 06/11/16 12:12, Ilario Gelmetti wrote:
On 11/05/2016 09:03 AM, Amuza wrote:
> I have played with Nanostation M5, and they work ok, but I
> am looking for a more directional solution for a long
> distance poin-to-point link within a noisy environment.
My experience in the field is too limited for giving you an
answer. Anyway looking at the supported Ubiquiti devices the
PowerBeam M5 400 (PBE-M5-400
https://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/ubiquiti/powerbeam) looks good.
But, I have not seen
any "PowerBeam" word or similar within the
binaries cooked by the Chef for my network. The "ubnt" binaries
I find are: air-gateway, airrouter, bullet, loco, ls, nano,
rocket, rs, uap, unifi...
Sorry I didn't specify, for the Ubiquiti airMax
hardware serie
there are just a few OpenWrt/LEDE images which differs in how
many ethernet and USB port are present on the device, as
explained here:
https://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/ubiquiti/airmaxm
So, the PowerBeam and NanoBeam have just one ethernet port and no
USB: the "bullet" image should be the most suitable one.
Terrific! I
will downgrade to 5.5 and then I'll try with the
"bullet" image from the Chef. Thanks.
I just don't know what is the
"loco" image...
Loco is the name of some NanoStation models [1]. It is
also the
Spanish word describing the state I turn into when trying to
understand all this chipset thing... The link you sent [2] reads
ar71xx chipset, but on the Ubiquity site -for models like PowerBeam
or NanoStation- I just can find Atheros MIPS 74Kc, 560 MHz...
[1]
https://www.ubnt.com/airmax/nanostationm/ [2]
https://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/ubiquiti/airmaxm
Hi again. I got the suggested PowerBeam, the PBE-M5-400.
I have downgraded it to version 5.5.
I am ready to flash it with Lime bin for bullet.
But I have just seen that the firmware of my PBE-M5-400 is XW,
as in some Nanostations.
However I do not see an XW Lime version for the bullet on the cooked
images from the Chef. What should I do? Shall I proceed anyway?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)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=+eae
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----