3 May
2019
3 May
'19
1:45 p.m.
I recently get attention on
* IPFS: https://ipfs.io
* YGGDRASIL: https://yggdrasil-network.github.io/about.html
This both combined gives amazing network features...
In the opinion of Lime conceptors and users, won't it be nice to compare
and merge mesh technologies?
3 May
3 May
2:48 p.m.
You could take a look at SAFE network (MaidSafe)
On May 3, 2019 9:45:19 PM GMT+08:00, fred <support(a)qo-op.com> wrote:
I recently get attention on
* IPFS: https://ipfs.io
* YGGDRASIL: https://yggdrasil-network.github.io/about.html
This both combined gives amazing network features...
In the opinion of Lime conceptors and users, won't it be nice to
compare
and merge mesh technologies?
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
--
Sent from my p≡p for Android.
4 May
4 May
9:56 a.m.
Le 03/05/2019 à 16:48, Nic a écrit :
You could take a look at SAFE network (MaidSafe)
Seems a good idea, but IPFS has a way of distributing data that makes it
unique. Like buiding storage trees we could have provate or public.
Gateways and IPDNS makes it easy to use as storage for DApp.
Do you have experience using MaidSafe?
On May 3, 2019 9:45:19 PM GMT+08:00, fred <support(a)qo-op.com> wrote:
I recently get attention on
* IPFS: https://ipfs.io
* YGGDRASIL: https://yggdrasil-network.github.io/about.html
This both combined gives amazing network features...
In the opinion of Lime conceptors and users, won't it be nice to
compare and merge mesh technologies?
--
Sent from my p≡p for Android.
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
3 May
3 May
9:20 p.m.
Yes. And with privacy of metadata it's even nicer. We call it GNUnet.org
Il 3 Maggio 2019 15:45:19 CEST, fred <support(a)qo-op.com> ha scritto:
I recently get attention on
* IPFS: https://ipfs.io
* YGGDRASIL: https://yggdrasil-network.github.io/about.html
This both combined gives amazing network features...
In the opinion of Lime conceptors and users, won't it be nice to
compare
and merge mesh technologies?
--
Inviato dal mio dispositivo Android con K-9 Mail. Perdonate la brevità.
4 May
4 May
9:54 a.m.
Le 03/05/2019 à 23:20, Daniel Golle a écrit :
Yes. And with privacy of metadata it's even
nicer. We call it GNUnet.org
Already heard about it, but didn't tryed yet... IPFS was providing arm
builds, didn't see it for GNUnet?
Are performances good? How data conservation and immutability is done?
Il 3 Maggio 2019 15:45:19 CEST, fred <support(a)qo-op.com> ha scritto:
I recently get attention on
* IPFS: https://ipfs.io
* YGGDRASIL: https://yggdrasil-network.github.io/about.html
This both combined gives amazing network features...
In the opinion of Lime conceptors and users, won't it be nice to
compare and merge mesh technologies?
--
Inviato dal mio dispositivo Android con K-9 Mail. Perdonate la brevità.
10:39 a.m.
On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 11:54:25AM +0200, fred wrote:
Le 03/05/2019 à 23:20, Daniel Golle a écrit :
GNUnet builds on literally all modern platforms. A slightly outdated
release is part of Debian stable, the just-released 0.11.x series is
likely to be part of Debian very soon.
I myself have been working to port GNUnet to OpenWrt which covers
everything from plastic routers with small MIPS CPUs up to powerful
multi-core systems. ARM builds of GNUnet packages for OpenWrt can be
found here (just to illustrate, usually you'd install it simply using
the distributions package manager):
https://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/packages/arm_cortex-a7_neon-vfpv4/p…
The source builds also on Mac OS X and even on Windows systems (using
Mingw, ie. no cygwin libs what-so-ever are required).
For testing and research, GNUnet is regularly built and deployed on
the SuperMUC supercomputer which allows simulating a large number
of network participants (including 'evil' behaviours).
Yes. And with privacy of metadata it's even
nicer. We call it GNUnet.org
Already heard about it, but didn't tryed yet... IPFS was providing arm
builds, didn't see it for GNUnet?
Are performances good? How data conservation and immutability is done?
Performance of the old release is not that great, however, a redesign
of the transport layer has brought about great improvements (however,
it will only be part of the next minor release).
I'm more involved in using GNUnet for things other than filesharing,
however, I'd recommend you to read chapter 5.4 Content storage of
https://git.gnunet.org/bibliography.git/plain/docs/main.pdf
Cheers
Daniel
Il 3 Maggio 2019 15:45:19 CEST, fred <support(a)qo-op.com> ha scritto:
I recently get attention on
* IPFS: https://ipfs.io
* YGGDRASIL: https://yggdrasil-network.github.io/about.html
This both combined gives amazing network features...
In the opinion of Lime conceptors and users, won't it be nice to
compare and merge mesh technologies?
--
Inviato dal mio dispositivo Android con K-9 Mail. Perdonate la brevità.
10:53 a.m.
Safe is not operational yet, now in alpha 3 and later this year hopefully its first beta.
I don't think you can compare these solutions. SAFE does not use blockchain (thank
God) it splits ever file in smaller chunks that are spread around on unknown (for 3rd
parties) storage spaces around the network, so no node contains the whole file. This is
anonymous, fast and according me besides the GNU network the best solution out there. GNU
might take the cake since it is ported to OpenMesh
On May 4, 2019 5:56:39 PM GMT+08:00, fred <support(a)qo-op.com> wrote:
Le 03/05/2019 à 16:48, Nic a écrit :
--
Sent from my p≡p for Android.
You could take a look at SAFE network (MaidSafe)
Seems a good idea, but IPFS has a way of distributing data that makes
it
unique. Like buiding storage trees we could have provate or public.
Gateways and IPDNS makes it easy to use as storage for DApp.
Do you have experience using MaidSafe?
On May 3, 2019 9:45:19 PM GMT+08:00, fred <support(a)qo-op.com> wrote:
I recently get attention on
* IPFS: https://ipfs.io
* YGGDRASIL: https://yggdrasil-network.github.io/about.html
This both combined gives amazing network features...
In the opinion of Lime conceptors and users, won't it be nice to
compare and merge mesh technologies?
--
Sent from my p≡p for Android.
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
_______________________________________________
lime-users mailing list
lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org
https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users
1818
days inactive
1819
days old
lime-users@lists.libremesh.org
6 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Daniel Golle -
fred -
Nic