we have a winner! On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Amuza <amuza(a)riseup.net> wrote: -- bruno(a)pobox.com ▀─█▄██▄▀▄ http://brunovianna.net ─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄ skype: randomico▀─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄▌██─█▌█▌ _______________________________________________ lime-users mailing list lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users

RoutingRevolution Am 27.03.2017 um 15:38 schrieb Nk: _______________________________________________ lime-users mailing list lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users

Hi Pau Nice idea. Are votes welcome from outside the ml [and outside my team of course ;] or members only? Thanks! Nk On 27 mar 2017, 23:15 +0200, Pau <pau(a)dabax.net>et>, wrote: _______________________________________________ lime-users mailing list lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users

On 28/03/17 11:25, Pau wrote: Being right now midnight UTC+1, i attach a snapshot of the current results so we have a clear winner, Dayboot Rely! congratulations to everyone cheers! > Cheers. > > On 28/03/17 10:00, Nk wrote: >> Hi Pau >> >> Nice idea. Are votes welcome from outside the ml [and outside my team of course ;] or members only? >> >> Thanks! >> >> Nk >> >> On 27 mar 2017, 23:15 +0200, Pau <pau(a)dabax.net>et>, wrote: >>> I've created a poll on framadate to vote for the name. >>> >>> https://framadate.org/ZnBehwGF8COhHmCz >>> >>> Let's put Wednesday 29th 00:00 UTC as deadline for voting. >>> New names only accepted until 28th 12:00 UTC. >>> >>> My proposal is maximum two votes per person. >>> >>> Please use a name which can be recognized as participant of this mailing >>> list or the IRC freenode channel. >>> >>> Cheers. >>> >>> On 27/03/17 16:22, Paul Spooren wrote: >>>> RoutingRevolution >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 27.03.2017 um 15:38 schrieb Nk: >>>>> Hi all! Awesome news! >>>>> >>>>> All of our team has been on a brainstorming loop over this topic this >>>>> morning as soon as we read the mail and these are the ideas that have >>>>> been tossed around ;] >>>>> >>>>> With a *D*: >>>>> >>>>> *Distributed Dawning* [or *Decentralized* as @Amusa suggested] ** >>>>> *Disruptive Development* >>>>> *Dynamic Diversity* >>>>> >>>>> [*Distributed* as the most extreme level as *decentralization*, also a >>>>> very cool term as @Amusa pointed out] >>>>> [I love this definition of *Dawning*: To begin to appear or develop; >>>>> emerge.] >>>>> [*Diversity*: Using multiple antennae to reduce interference and >>>>> improve both transmission and reception of signals.] >>>>> >>>>> With an *R*: >>>>> >>>>> *Recursive Resonance* >>>>> *Redundant Rebirth* >>>>> *Resonant Reboot* >>>>> * >>>>> * >>>>> [*Resonance*: Mechanical resonance is the tendency of a mechanical >>>>> system to respond at greater amplitude when the frequency of its >>>>> oscillations matches the system's natural frequency of vibration (its >>>>> resonance frequency or resonant frequency) than it does at other >>>>> frequencies.] >>>>> >>>>> Some are rather self-ironically nerdy of course, but isn’t that the >>>>> point? ;] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 27 mar 2017, 15:18 +0200, bruno vianna <bruno(a)pobox.com>om>, wrote: >>>>>> we have a winner! >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Amuza <amuza(a)riseup.net> wrote: >>>>>>> DecentralizedDeity >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 26/03/17 18:05, Pau wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Last weeks a group of us have been working on LibreMesh to deliver what >>>>>>> will be the next release based on LEDE 17.01. For such purpose some of >>>>>>> us have moved to a rural area of Argentina where exist a Community >>>>>>> Network made of 70 nodes (approx). We are testing the new firmware >>>>>>> here, >>>>>>> finding and fixing problems which are only observable when there is >>>>>>> real >>>>>>> user data. So we expect this new release to be the most stable and >>>>>>> reliable until now. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Probably this week we will publish the first candidate but we are still >>>>>>> missing something important... the name. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Until now we were trying to follow the name rules used by OpenWRT (AA, >>>>>>> BB, CC, ...), so what we had was: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - BigBang >>>>>>> - CommunityChaos >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Then this one should be named DD. But as OpenWRT is kind of abandoned >>>>>>> and now we are using LEDE, maybe we should also change the name rules >>>>>>> (¿maybe?). The LEDE release is named "Reboot". So names related with >>>>>>> Reboot or starting with 'R' would be also an option. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In any case we are open to any idea. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> lime-users mailing list >>>>>>> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org >>>>>>> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> lime-users mailing list >>>>>>> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org >>>>>>> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> bruno(a)pobox.com ▀─█▄██▄▀▄ >>>>>> http://brunovianna.net ─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄ >>>>>> skype: randomico▀─█▄██▄▀█▀█▄▌██─█▌█▌ >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> lime-users mailing list >>>>>> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org >>>>>> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> lime-users mailing list >>>>> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org >>>>> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> lime-users mailing list >>>> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org >>>> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users >>> >>> -- >>> ./p4u >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> lime-users mailing list >>> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org >>> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lime-users mailing list >> lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org >> https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > lime-users mailing list > lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org > https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > lime-users mailing list > lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org > https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users

On 03/28/2017 08:09 PM, Pau wrote: I believe there's no problem voting again. I propose we have a bit more time to vote this time around.

Cheers!!! Nico _______________________________________________ lime-users mailing list lime-users(a)lists.libremesh.org https://lists.libremesh.org/mailman/listinfo/lime-users

On 29/03/17 01:33, Nicolás Echániz wrote: I don't really know how to understand the "yellow" votes. If we count them as "yes" the two winners are "Disruptive Development" and "Routing Revolution" :/ So it is definitely a disruptive poll... Maybe voting again with the three "winners" would be the best.